AI you can
trust.
Drift builds AI around the requirements that make adoption difficult: sensitive information, professional confidentiality, reliable answers and accountable decisions.
Data protection
by design.
We limit data collection to what the task needs and define how information is processed, accessed and retained.
Depending on the implementation, deployment options can include a local model environment or an external provider with agreed retention arrangements. Local processing and zero data retention are different options; we make that distinction clear.
Legal framework DSGVO ↗
This supports the implementation of data minimisation, privacy by design and appropriate security measures under Articles 5, 25 and 32 DSGVO. Processor agreements and international-transfer requirements are assessed where applicable.
Read the DSGVO ↗Confidentiality built
into the service.
For law-firm implementations, we define which information the AI needs and which providers or people may access it. Confidentiality requirements inform provider selection, access arrangements and contractual responsibilities.
Defined.
Limited.
Agreed.
Legal framework BRAO · StGB ↗
The relevant framework includes lawyers’ confidentiality duties under § 43a BRAO, service-provider requirements under § 43e BRAO and the protection of professional secrets under § 203 StGB.
Answers grounded
in approved information.
We configure AI for defined tasks using approved sources. We test its responses against the intended service and establish what happens when information is missing or a request falls outside its scope.
The aim is to give your team a system with a clear purpose, known limits and a route to human support.
Human review
where it matters.
We define which steps the AI may handle, which require review and when a person must take over. Escalations carry relevant context so your team can review, correct or continue the process.
Legal framework RDG · VwVfG · AI Act ↗
This helps establish the operational boundaries needed for legal services under the RDG, official decisions under applicable administrative law, and relevant human-oversight obligations under the EU AI Act. It does not replace the authorisation or legal basis required for the underlying service.
A defined path
into use.
We work with your team to establish the intended use, configure the system and evaluate it before extending its scope.
AI Act requirements are assessed according to the system’s purpose and classification. Public-sector accessibility, state data-protection rules and other service-specific obligations are included where they apply.
You can start with one task through Qualify, Onboard, Assess or Resolve, then consider additional capabilities once the initial implementation has been evaluated.
Explore the four products ↗Let’s start with
your service.
Tell us about your service, the information it handles and the responsibilities your team carries.
Talk to Drift ↗